Module 5 Development

1) First topic on development is transportation and location is LA, Southern California area. Here is he web link at Colby University in Maine, from which the study is drawn upon; http://personal.colby.edu/personal/t/thtieten/trans-cal.html. The study relates to the traffic and congestion problems in the LA area. Private developers were granted access to develop a new 2 lane toll lane highway along side the CA. 91 state highway in a private sector attempt for profit, and to reduce traffic apparently in the name of profit. This is seemingly development for profit and people who can only afford such development. In my opinion it is in part unfair to the majority of the populous. The goal here was to lessen traffic and the commute times for commuting motorists. Might they have done better with a multi passenger ans high occupancy (buses) lanes instead?

2) Second topic on development is regarding Vibrant Rural Communities: Lewistown, Pennsylvania. Here is the link for the study done by NADO.org; http://www.nado.org/vibrant-rural-communities-lewistown-pennsylvania/. Local, state, federal and private investors concerned with the communities well being and growth invested strategized and planned a rehabilitation and revitalization for the town which had previously seen better days. They have successfully revitalized the downtown region of the community renovating vacant structures redeveloping former industrial sites transforming a new prosperous downtown. This has benefited the people of the town by way of jobs, tax base and new industry and activity to the region. In my estimation some 50 million dollars have been spent in efforts to redevelop and preserve the town for the people and prosperity.” The study is part of the NADO Research Foundation’s Vibrant Rural Communities SERIES OF CASE STUDIES which describes how rural regions and small towns across the country are growing local and regional economies and creating stronger communities”. This is all relevant and inclusive of this weeks topic(s) of development.” http://www.nado.org/vibrant-rural-communities-lewistown-pennsylvania/

3) Where I currently live in Asheville North Carolina, both subjects above are most relevant and applicable in the areas of Development. As of recently (in the last 10 years) and more increasingly the Asheville area has seen quite a bit of this type of renewal activity on a larger scale however than Lewistion, Penna. has undergone. Many millions of dollars have been spent and plan to be spent on revitalizing the area. Projects include rehabilitation of structures new building, new hotels among others. This relating to all areas of more development and prosperous community. Also in the very near future the community will undoubtedly have to consider widening and expanding certain roadways that are now already under served and outdated. A great deal has been done in Asheville and there is a long way to go. Conservatives in the state will still undoubtedly try to block sending tax dollars to the area for progress and expansion of the area. This is a huge problem for lack of development in the south and south eastern states. Asheville however has and will continue its expansion with or with out certain portions of what would otherwise e more available tax money blocked by right wing conservatives.

2 thoughts on “Module 5 Development

  1. Hey Brian Im Mike and here is a link to my blog post. http://sites.psu.edu/geog30/2016/02/26/michael-simons-can-i-reuse-this-plastic-bag/
    I like your thoughts on the 2 lane system in California. I too believe they could have done a better job and that this system doesn’t help too much with the congestion and traffic there. Also, I do believe it is unfair because now people have to pay more money. But at least California is realizing their traffic problem and are making more advances to fix this problem.

  2. Hi! I’m Jess and here is my blog: http://geog030.dutton.psu.edu/2016/02/26/jessica-moritz/. I talked about elephant and lobster population declines, which I related back to my hometown of deer population decreases. I find it interesting that California added the 2 lanes to decrease traffic but now people have to pay more. I agree with you that this is unfair because now people have to pay even more money. It is good that they realized their traffic problem and came up with a solution to fix it. This goes back to my articles because they realized the population decrease was such a problem that they put rules in place.

Leave a Reply